<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Funding For Political Sins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispalmer.org/2007/12/02/public-funding-for-political-sins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispalmer.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chrispalmer.org%2F2007%2F12%2F02%2Fpublic-funding-for-political-sins%2F%23comment-&#038;seed_title=Public+Funding+For+Political+Sins</link>
	<description>A Strong Conservative Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalmer.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chrispalmer.org%2F2007%2F12%2F02%2Fpublic-funding-for-political-sins%2F%23comment-37&#038;seed_title=Public+Funding+For+Political+Sins/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Bay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalmer.org/2007/12/02/public-funding-for-political-sins/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Political parties recieves public founding in France, yet a simple look at Chirac&#039;s carrer go on to tell a long way about how &#039;clean&#039; he was with money. The only advantage I can see for public founding is the fact that &#039;small&#039; parties recieves some money from the government, but this is more than negated by the fact that the main parties would recieves millions of pounds for nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political parties recieves public founding in France, yet a simple look at Chirac&#8217;s carrer go on to tell a long way about how &#8216;clean&#8217; he was with money. The only advantage I can see for public founding is the fact that &#8216;small&#8217; parties recieves some money from the government, but this is more than negated by the fact that the main parties would recieves millions of pounds for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barlow</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalmer.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chrispalmer.org%2F2007%2F12%2F02%2Fpublic-funding-for-political-sins%2F%23comment-35&#038;seed_title=Public+Funding+For+Political+Sins/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalmer.org/2007/12/02/public-funding-for-political-sins/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Damn right - politics is a vocation, not a career.

When discussing political funding, I often refer people to the book Freakonomics published a few years ago, in which it was well demonstrated that you can&#039;t buy votes - money flows to successful parties, but it doesn&#039;t lead to victory at the ballot box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn right &#8211; politics is a vocation, not a career.</p>
<p>When discussing political funding, I often refer people to the book Freakonomics published a few years ago, in which it was well demonstrated that you can&#8217;t buy votes &#8211; money flows to successful parties, but it doesn&#8217;t lead to victory at the ballot box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

